Sample cover letter for Full Time position at Nature Conservancy
Dear Hiring Manger,
I am writing to express my interest in the Urban Conservation Program Manager position posted through Indeed.com. As a development and communications professional with four years of experience in corporate and non-profit relations, program development, and fundraising, I am confident I have the required qualifications and skills to be very successful in this position. Please note that I will be relocating to Denver, Co on July 1st 2016 and will be available before that for in person interviews
As a Communications and Development Coordinator for Global Health Alliance, I worked closely with local and international NGOs and Corporations to increase funding and to promote changes in government policy. While managing relations with government officials and NGOS I designed content for all social media platforms including E-newsletters, Facebook, Twitter, website, social mediacampaigns. During my time inthis roleI worked with the World Health Agency to coordinate events and campaigns in DC, Copenhagen, and Geneva to bring together distinguished health leaders and other organizations for improving government policy.
While working as a Lead Grant Writer and Assistant Event Coordinator for Catholic Charities, I was tasked to handle many different local agency’s grants, program evaluations, and budgets. During my time at this firm I secured five grants totaling $480K that directly fundedcommunity agencies. I also conducted 15 program evaluations concentrating on health, education, and career management. . Consulting allowed meto manage several challenging tasks with tight deadlines and required me nurture professional relationships with key stakeholders in many non-profit organizations in order to meet detail-orientated deliverables.
As an Assistant Event Coordinator for Catholic Charities of Chicago I co-chaired the 40th Anniversary Refugee Resettlement Gala committee of 15 people while managing budgets, designing project timelines fundraising and procuring vendors. This event raised over $100K from fundraising, donors, and the silent auction. I also secured sponsorships for six other events with multiple companies such as Kellogg, Wintrust Bank, MB Financial, and Chicago Beverage Company.In this role, I managed and created lasting relationships with donors and donor prospects for gifts over $10K and developed a budget plan for the major donor program of Catholic Charities. In this position assisted Catholic Charities to fulfill their mission and help populations in need.
As the Urban Conservation Program Manager I would be able to integrate my experience with both corporate and local relations and also utilize my fundraising and community engagement skills. I have a passion for both personal growth and continuous learning of new development methods to connecting with high impact communities due to my Social Work background. I am someone who believes in innovative solutions to urban challenges. Based on this information I believe I am the ideal candidate for the position at the Nature Conservancy.
I have included my resume for your review and hope to discuss my qualifications with you. I can be reached at X or via email at X
See our template for making your own punchy cover letter
Get access to over 7,000 cover letters from candidates getting jobs at your target companies.
Part one of our 3-part series on the dos and don’ts of communicating with editors and reviewers.
A good cover letter is a crucial part of the manuscript submission package to Nature Methods. It is not simply an archaic form of communication that is becoming obsolete in a digital world; rather, it should be viewed as an opportunity to convey many important pieces of information about a paper to the editors.
Manuscripts submitted to Nature Methods must first pass an editorial evaluation stage, but as professional editors, we are not experts in every scientific field that the journal covers. Providing context for the paper in a cover letter not only can help the editors reach a quicker decision but also can sometimes tip the balance in favor of sending a borderline paper out for peer review.
Here are some practical tips for potential authors.
- Do give a brief, largely non-technical summary of the method. Explain how it will have an impact and why the method and its applications will be interesting to a broad biological audience. This can include more forward-looking information about potential future applications that authors may be reticent to share with reviewers or readers of their manuscript. Such a summary is especially crucial for highly technical papers, where the chance that the advance may not be fully appreciated by the editors is often higher.
- Do put the work in context. Briefly explain the novelty and the specific advances over previous work but be realistic about what the method can and cannot achieve. Many authors are hesitant to compare their work to previous methods for fear that it will appear to reviewers that they are putting down the contributions of other researchers. But editors may not be aware of the nuances of various approaches to address a methodological problem and are more likely to reject a paper without peer review when the advance over previous work is not clear. Authors should not hesitate to discuss freely in the cover letter why they believe method is an advance (most ideally, backed up with strong performance characteristics in the manuscript!).
- Do suggest referees. If the editors decide to send the paper for peer review, providing a list of potential referees, their email addresses, and a very short description of their expertise, can help the editor assign referees more rapidly. Of course, whether the editor decides to use any of the suggested referees is up to him or her. This is also the place to list researchers that you believe should be excluded from reviewing the paper. (Please note that the names of excluded reviewers should also be included in the relevant field of the online submission form.) The editors will honor your exclusion list as long as you don’t exclude more than five people; if you exclude everyone relevant in a scientific field such that the review process will not be productive or fair, the editor may ask you to shorten the list.
- Do tell us about any related work from your group under consideration or in press elsewhere. Explain how it relates, and include copies of the related manuscripts with your submission.
- Do mention any unusual circumstances. For example, known competition with another group’s paper, co-submission to Nature Methods planned with another group, or co-submission of a related results paper to another NPG journal, etc.
- Do mention if you have previously discussed the work with an editor. As editors, we meet a lot of researchers at conferences and lab visits and many papers are pitched to us. A brief mention of when and where such a conversation occurred can help jog the memory of why we invited the authors to submit it in the first place.
- Don’t simply reiterate that you have submitted a paper to us and/or copy and paste the title and abstract of the paper. The cover letter should be viewed as an opportunity to present useful meta-information about the paper, and not tossed off simply as a submission requirement.
- Don’t go on for pages about what the paper is about and summarize all of your results. The editor will always read the paper itself so long cover letters are usually redundant. A one-page cover letter in almost all cases is sufficient.
- Don’t use highly technical jargon and acronyms. Explaining the advance in a general manner can go a long way in helping the editors reach a quicker decision; cover letters that are largely unreadable are of no help to the editors.
- Don’t overhype or over-interpret. While a description of why the method will advance the field is definitely appreciated, obvious overstatements about the impact or reach of the work do not help and can even reflect poorly on the authors’ judgment of the needs of a field.
- Don’t assume that going on about your scientific reputation or endorsements from others in the field will sway us. This is not pertinent to our editorial decision. Our decisions are based on whether we think the paper will be a good editorial fit for the journal, not on the laurels of the authors or because someone important in the field suggested that they submit the work to Nature Methods
And finally, a minor editorial pet peeve:
- Don’t address your cover letter to “Dear Sir.” This is antiquated language, not to mention often incorrect, given that two-thirds of Nature Methods’ editors are women. Stick to the gender-neutral “Dear Editor” in cases where you are not addressing a specific editor.
Don’t miss parts 2 and 3 of this series of posts covering rebuttal letters and appeal letters. We encourage questions, comments and feedback below. The editors will do their best to answer any questions you have.